Monday, April 21, 2008

Ohio: Buckeyes for Equal Access Action Alert! Urgent!



BUCKEYES FOR EQUAL ACCESS:
OPEN RECORDS FOR ALL OHIO ADOPTEES

PLEASE DISTRIBUTE FREELY

OHIO ACTION ALERT

BUCKEYES FOR EQUAL ACCESS SAYS:
OHIO ADOPTEES NEED YOUR HELP NOW!

SUB BILL ERASES BIRTH CERTIFICATE ACCESS

BeaOhio: beaohio@gmail.com
http://www.myspace.com/beaohio

On April 16, 2008 a substitute bill for HB 7, an adoption/fostercare reform bill, which included original birth certificate access for all post-1963 adopted adults without restriction, was introduced in the Ohio House Health The sub bill, (also called LSC ), deletes all reference to obc access found in the original bill; thus, maintaining the current 3-tiered yes-no-maybe system that divides obc access by date of adoption/date of birth and first parent permission.*

BILL INFORMATION
Original HB 7: http://www.legislature.state.oh.us/bills.cfm?ID=127_HB_7 (click on link at left)
Sub HB 7: http://www.adoptionnetwork.org/filegallery.asp?f=270&linkId=1346 (2n square on right—pdf.)

HEARING
A hearing on Sub Bill 7 bill is scheduled for 4:00 PM, Wednesday, April 23 in Room 017 (basement) of the Statehouse Testimony requesting the reinstatement of unrestricted obc access can be given. Bring 20 copies of your testimony for the committee. If you can’t testify, then come to support.

If you plan to testify please call Kara Joseph in Rep. Tom Brinkman’s office at .
We have been told that another hearing on Sub Bill 7 will probably be held on Wednesday, April 30 so save that date, too. Please check with our MySpace page for updates. http://www.myspace.com/beaohio

FULL ACCESS MUST BE RETURNED!
CONTACT
If you are an Ohio adoptee, birthparent, adoptive parent or currently live in Ohio or have an Ohio connection, please contact the Health Committee today and urge them to:

• Support HB 7 as written. Reject Sub Bill 7 unless the exact unrestricted access language from the original HB 7 is restored.

• Support the addition of a contact preference form, if presented.

• Reject all attempts to restrict obc access to any adopted adult for any reason through disclosure vetoes or other methods.

TALKING POINTS—HB 7 as written
• is inclusive. It acknowledges a legally, morally, and ethically correct one-size-fits all standard of identity and records rights for all adopted persons. It treats the adopted the same as the non-adopted.

• treats all Ohio adoptees equally. It abolishes the discriminatory 3-tiered access system based on date of birth, date of adoption availability, or birth parent permission.

• does not open original birth certificates and other records to the public.

• does not change adoption procedures

• is pro-adoption. It is not controversial. It reflects best practice adoption standards. Unrestricted access to the original birth certificate is a priority of every adoption reform organization in the US. Unrestricted access is supported by the majority adoption professionals.

• is about rights not reunions. It is about the relation of adoptees to the state.

• is non-partisan. In states where access has been restored, Republicans and Democrats sponsored the legislation and voted YES.

If you are a birthparent tell the committee:

• You were never promised anonymity nor did you ask for it.

• You do not expect or need “special rights”

If you are an adoptive parent tell the committee:

• Your son or daughter is not a second class citizen; he or she deserves the same right of identity and public records access as the not-adopted.

• Adoption is a strong institution and can only be strengthened in Ohio by openness and truth.

*Current Ohio law:
• Persons adopted before January 1, 1964: unrestricted access
• Persons adopted January 1, 1964-September 18, 1996: access by court order
• Persons adopted September 19, 1996-present: unrestricted access at age of majority unless a birthparent has filed a disclosure veto with the state; then the adoptee is barred from receiving a copy of their original birth certificate—the public record of their own birth.

PLEASE E-MAIL, WRITE, CALL, or FAX THE MEMBERS OF OHIO HOUSE HEALTH COMMITTEE IMMEDIATELY. TELL THEM TO SUPPORT HB 7 AS WRITTEN AND THAT ANY RESTRICTION TO ACCESS IS UNACCEPTABLE TO OHIO ADOPTEES. TELL THEM YOUR LIFE AND RIGHTS COUNT.

The most important members to contact, by phone even if you talk to their aides, are Representatives Matt Huffman (R-Lima), Robert Mecklenborg (R-Cincinnati), and Speaker of the House Jon Husted.

*Speaker Jon Husted
77 S. High St.
Columbus, OH
Telephone:
Fax:
Email Address: district37@odr.state.oh.us

HEALTH COMMITTEE: Chair:
*Lynn Wachtmann (R)
District 75
77 S. High St
11th Floor
Columbus, OH
Telephone:
Fax :
Email Address: district75@ohr.state.oh.us

Ranking Minority Member:
Brian G. Williams (D)
District 41
77 S. High St
10th Floor
Columbus, OH
Telephone:
Fax :
Email Address: district41@ohr.state.oh.us

Members:
Barbara Boyd (D)
District 09
77 S. High St
10th Floor
Columbus, OH
Telephone:
Fax :
Email Address: district09@ohr.state.oh.us

Edna Brown (D)
District 48
77 S. High St
10th Floor
Columbus, OH
Telephone:
Fax :
Email Address: district48@ohr.state.oh.us

Michael DeBose (D)
District 12
77 S. High St
10th Floor
Columbus, OH
Telephone:
Fax :
Email Address: district12@ohr.state.oh.us

Lorraine M. Fende (D)
District 62
77 S. High St
11th Floor
Columbus, OH
Telephone:
Fax :
Email Address: district62@ohr.state.oh.us

Bruce W. Goodwin (R)
District 74
77 S. High St
13th Floor
Columbus, OH
Telephone:
Fax :
Email Address: district74@ohr.state.oh.us

Jay Hottinger (R)
District 71
77 S. High St
13th Floor
Columbus, OH
Telephone:
Fax :
Email Address: district71@ohr.state.oh.us

Matt Huffman (R)
District 04
77 S. High St
11th Floor
Columbus, OH
Telephone:
Fax :
Email Address: district04@ohr.state.oh.us

Shannon Jones (R)
District 67
Assistant Majority Whip
77 S. High St
11th Floor
Columbus, OH
Telephone:
Fax :
Email Address: district67@ohr.state.oh.us

Tom Letson (D)
District 64
77 S. High St
11th Floor
Columbus, OH
Telephone:
Fax :
Email Address: district64@ohr.state.oh.us

*Robert Mecklenborg (R)
District 30
77 S. High St
14th Floor
Columbus, OH
Telephone: , or in district
Fax :
Email Address: district30@ohr.state.oh.us

Robert J. Otterman (D)
District 45
77 S. High St
10th Floor
Columbus, OH
Telephone:
Fax :
Email Address: district45@ohr.state.oh.us

W. Scott Oelslager (R)
District 51
77 S. High St
13th Floor
Columbus, OH
Telephone:
Fax :
Email Address: district51@ohr.state.oh.us

Robert F. Hagan (D)
District 60
77 S. High St
11th Floor
Columbus, OH
Telephone:
Fax :
Email Address: district60@ohr.state.oh.us

James T. Raussen (R)
District 28
77 S. High St
13th Floor
Columbus, OH
Telephone:
Fax :
Email Address: district28@ohr.state.oh.us

Chris Redfern (D)
District 80
77 S. High St
10th Floor
Columbus, OH
Telephone:
Fax :
Email Address: district80@ohr.state.oh.us

Carol-Ann Schindel (R)
District 63
77 S. High St
11th Floor
Columbus, OH
Telephone:
Fax :
Email Address: district63@ohr.state.oh.us

Fred Strahorn (D)
District 40
Assistant Minority Whip
77 S. High St
14th Floor
Columbus, OH
Telephone:
Fax :
Email Address: district40@ohr.state.oh.us

Joseph W. Uecker (R)
District 66
77 S. High St
11th Floor
Columbus, OH
Telephone:
Fax :
Email Address: district66@ohr.state.oh.us

Shawn N. Webster (R)
District 53
77 S. High St
13th Floor
Columbus, OH
Telephone:
Fax :
Email Address: district53@ohr.state.oh.us

Kenny Yuko (D)
District 07
77 S. High St
11th Floor
Columbus, OH
Telephone:
Fax :
Email Address: district07@ohr.state.oh.us

Cut and Past NOTE: addys have no names):

district37@odr.state.oh.us, district75@ohr.state.oh.us, district41@ohr.state.oh.us, district09@ohr.state.oh.us
district48@ohr.state.oh.us, district12@ohr.state.oh.us
district62@ohr.state.oh.us, district74@ohr.state.oh.us
district71@ohr.state.oh.us, district04@ohr.state.oh.us
district67@ohr.state.oh.us, district64@ohr.state.oh.us
district30@ohr.state.oh.us, district45@ohr.state.oh.us
district51@ohr.state.oh.us, district60@ohr.state.oh.us
district28@ohr.state.oh.us, district80@ohr.state.oh.us
district63@ohr.state.oh.us, district40@ohr.state.oh.us
district66@ohr.state.oh.us, district53@ohr.state.oh.us
district07@ohr.state.oh.us

Labels:

Wednesday, April 16, 2008

TOP TEN LIST: CHICAGO BAR ASSOCIATION


GRANNIE ANNIE’S
TOP TEN LIST
THE CHICAGO BAR ASSOCIATION


10. Why do some Illinois State Representatives tell me that in order to get legislative approval for any adoptee rights bill, and in particular HB 4623, (a bill to give some adopted adults their original birth certificate) it must first pass muster with the Chicago Bar Association?


9. Why does the Chicago Bar Association ALWAYS oppose the unconditional issuing of original birth certificates to adopted men and women?


8. Are you all adoptive parents?


7. What legal right, duty, or hold does the bar association have over adopted adults?


6. Are the members of the Chicago Bar Association smarter than members of adoptee rights organizations?


5. Does the Chicago Bar Association have more experience being adopted than members of adoptee rights organizations?


4. Is the bar association afraid that the legislators aren’t smart enough to present a bill that is legal?


3. Are you all birth mothers or birth fathers?


2. Why is the Chicago Bar Association special in the eyes of the lawmakers? Why did you get a heads up on the date and time of the Wednesday, March 13, 2008 hearing on HB 4623? Representative Sara Feigenholtz scheduled a hearing AND VOTE on HB 4623 but did not let the public know until just hours before the hearing was set, thus effectively preventing the public from expressing its opinions on this bill. Does she like you better than she likes me?


AND THE NUMBER ONE QUESTION FOR THE CHICAGO BAR ASSOCIATION IS

1. WHAT’S IN IT FOR YOU?

Tuesday, April 08, 2008


BASTARD NATION: THE ADOPTEE RIGHTS ORGANIZATION
P.O. Box 1469
Edmond, OK

www.bastards.org


PLEASE DISTRIBUTE FREELY
ILLINOIS ACTION ALERT
URGE THE ILLINOIS HOUSE TO VOTE NO ON HB4623

HB 4623, sponsored by Representative Sara Feigenholtz, is a dangerous bill and must be voted down. Sometime during the month of April, the Illinois House of Representatives is scheduled to vote on HB4623. We do not know what day the bill will get to the House floor, so we must ACT IMMEDIATELY in order to let our voices be heard. {Please see easy Contact Information below}

IF PASSED INTO LAW, HB 4623 WOULD…
…..give birth parents 6 months after the bill is passed to file “Denial of Information” forms with the Adoption Registry. Any adoptee whose birth parent files a “Denial of Information” form will NOT receive an original birth certificate. This section includes a 6 month advertising campaign to let birthmothers know their choices.

…..define three different classes of adult adoptees, those born before 1946, those born between January 1, 1946 and January 2009, and all prospective adoptions.

…..give all prospective birth parents 21 years in which to file a Denial of Information Form. Current law requires them to file a denial within 6 months.

…..give birth parents 5 options that range from contact to anonymity to choose from.

…..permit redacting ( or whiting-out) an official document.

…..codify "anonymity" for the first time.

…..make all of the birth parent options go through the Illinois Adoption Registry where the concerns are related to searching rather than to civil rights.

…..allow for the possibility of adoptees receiving copies of birth certificates with birth parent names removed as well as the adoptee's name.

…..grant access veto powers to birth parents who relinquished all legal rights to the adoptee as a child.

PLEASE E-MAIL, WRITE, CALL, or FAX THE MEMBERS OF THE ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES IMMEDIATELY. TELL THEM THAT HB4623 IS A SERIOUSLY FLAWED BILL WHICH MUST BE VOTED DOWN SO THAT A TRUE ADOPTEE RIGHTS BILL CAN BE WRITTEN AND FILED IN ITS PLACE.

WE HAVE BEEN TOLD THAT THE BILL NEEDS 70+ VOTES IN ORDER TO PASS OUT OF THE HOUSE. WE MUST PUT AN END TO IT RIGHT IN THE HOUSE WHERE IT BEGAN!

Background
HB 4623 began back in January as a shell bill purportedly to make changes to the IL CI system. On Monday, March 10th, Rep. Feigenholtz announced her new OBC search bill, HB 4623. On Tuesday, March 12, the shell bill was transformed into the new 77 page OBC search bill. On Wednesday, March 13th, the new bill went straight to the House Adoption Reform Committee, of which Rep. Feigenholtz just happens to be chair. That very same day, the committee voted 8-1 vote to pass the bill. The new 77 page bill was only put up on the IL website hours before the hearing so there was no time for interested parties to testify. No wonder the committee passed the bill; even they didn't have time to read all 77 pages.

This bill has been rejected by many adoption reform coalitions, including Illinois Open.

The 77 page complete text of the bill is here

ADDITIONAL RESOURCES

Bastard Nation
Illinois Open My Space
Illinois Open web page
Adoption Reform Illinois Resource Page: HB 4623 opposition coalition letter to legislators and media


CUT AND PASTE ILLINOIS HOUSE:

A full list of contact information is at Illinois Open

eacevedo@hdsmail.state.il.us, Repdistrict3@yahoo.com,
epbassi@aol.com
,
strepmbeaubien@aol.com,rep@pbellock.com,

rep_berrios@yahoo.com, bobbiggins@comcast.net, wbblack@cooketech.net,ilrepmikeboland@aol.com, mikebost@midwestmail.com,rbradley@hdsmail.state.il.us,
dan@repdanbrady.com
,rbrauerr@housegopmail.state.il.us JBROSNAHAN@PRODIGY.net,burekdj@legis.state.il.us,
Chapalaviali@legis.state.il, usrepcolvin@sbcglobal.net, coulson@earthlink.net,tom@tomcross.com.
Repcurrie@earthlink.net
,
mdavis@hdsmail.state.il.us
,williamd@legis.state.il.us,
Lisadugan@sbcglobal.net
, kendunkin@msn.com,
joe@josephdunn.com
, Reddyunit1@aol.com,
sara@staterepsara.com
,bobflider@repflider.com,
mflowers@hdsmail.state.il.us
,Jack@JackFranks.org,
mystaterep@aol.com
,staterep,Paul@sbcglobal.net,
staterepgordon@sbcglobal.net
,st.rep.graham@sbcglobal.net,
julie@juliehamos.org
,hannig@hdsmail.state.il.us,
hoffman@legis.state.il.us
,strephow@legis.state.il.us,
n.jakobsson@worldnet.att.net
, staterepchuck67@aol.com,
kevinjoyce35@aol.com
,rkosel@aol.com, Repkrause@aol.com,Reploulang@aol.com,
davidleitch@ameritech.net
, dstrct50@aol.com,
repmendoza@aol.com, judybe@ameritech.net,mmadigan@housedem.state.il.us
, sidneymath@email.msn.com,brandy@ivnet.com,
karenmay58@aol.com
, mmcauliffe20@yahoo.com,
kevmac37@sbcglobal.net
,jmcguire86@sbcglobal.net,
jhmeyer@gmail.com
,repdavidmiller@aol.com,
repmitchell@earthlink.net
, repjmitchell@cin.net,
moffitt@grics.com
,repmulligan@USA.net, ruthmunson@ruthmunson.com,repmeyers@mccomb.com, enekirtz@repnekritz.org, osmondjoann@aol.com, CGMORROW11132@aol.com,poer@housegopmail.state.il.us,
70thdist@pritchardstaterep.com
,johnjmillner@aol.com,
cyberelm@earthlink.com,leader@mcleodusa.net,
epreitz@egyptian.net
,Kelly38@sbcglobal.net,
robertbobrita@aol.com
,chapin@chapinrose.com, kathy@kathyryg.org,jmsacia@aeroinc.net,
skip@saviano.com
,ilrep49@sbcglobal.net,
rslone@bwsys.net
,
repscully@sbcglobal.net
,mks@winco.com,
sommer@mtco.com
,staterepsoto@aol.com,
stephens@apci.net
,ilhouse51@sbcglobal.net,
jiltracy@jiltracy.com
,rkurtz@mc.net,
pverschoore@legis.state.il.us
, RepWait@aol.com,
washington60th@aol.com
, jimwatson@localnetco.com,
repwinters@aol.com
, kyarbrough@hdsmail.state.il.us,






Labels: ,

Saturday, December 29, 2007

GRAND OPENING! ILLINOIS OPEN!


GRAND OPENING

PLEASE FORWARD FREELY

ILLINOIS OPEN
http://www.ilopen.org
obc@ilopen.org



MISSION STATEMENT
Illinois Open advocates the issuing to all Illinois adult adoptees, upon request an unconditionally, a copy of their unaltered original birth certificate.


GOALS
Illinois Open is an informational organization. Its goals are to educate the public about sealed records as well as locate grassroots supporters of equal access to the original birth certificate for all adopted men and women in Illinois.

Currently, the only way adopted adults in Illinois can receive a copy of their original birth certificate is by petitioning the court and showing good cause, a lengthy, costly, and time consuming process.

Illinois Open is asking the State of Illinois to repeal or amend its Adoption Act so that all adopted adults can get their original birth certificate in the same manner as all non-adopted citizens.


We want to hear from you.
Please write to us at:
obc@ilopen.org

Visit our MySpace page

Wednesday, November 28, 2007

Bastard Nation member JOANNE SMALL's "Adoption Mystique" is a finalist in the USA Book News 2007 National Best Books Awards

Kissimmee, Fl - November 2007 - On November 1, 2007, USABookNews.com, the premiere online magazine and review website for mainstream and independent publishing houses, announced the winners and finalist of the 2007 National Best Books Awards. Winners and finalists traversed the publishing landscape. They included publishing houses like Simon & Schuster, Penguin-Putnam, HarperCollins, Random House, and McGraw-Hill. Amongst the winners, The Adoption Mystique: A Hard-hitting Exposé of the Powerful Negative Social Stigma that Permeates Child Adoption in the United States was a finalist in the social change category.

Listed as recommended reading by The American Adoption Congress (AAC), The Adoption Mystique, written by Joanne Wolf Small, M. S. W., is a well researched book that questions and challenges the stigma that permeates the many readily accepted and rarely questioned social norms and myths that continue to support adoptee and adoptive family intolerance, and hinder efforts to make positive and healthy changes that would help to bring adoption policy and practice into the 21st century.

Midwest Book Review says, "The Adoption Mystique is not a general book about adoption, but rather a focused, politically-minded call for the civil rights of adoptees" as it "examines bias against adoptees in the media and society." Carrie Craft from About.com Adoption writes, "author Joanne Wolf Small, M.S.W. just doesn't break the adoption myth, she shatters it with her compilation of various research studies, essays, and personal knowledge on the subject of adoption...The Adoption Mystique is respectful and not at all anti-adoption, just pro-truth and openness." It is a useful proven resource for all whose lives have been touched by adoption.

"Your essays are so thoughtful - and so rich in conveying the historical context for adoption in general and the policies and practices surrounding information sharing, in particular, and in conveying the critical psychosocial issues that lie at the heart of adoption. I am certain that your book will be viewed as a critical resource for policy makers and practitioners seeking to better understand adoption." - Madelyn Freundlich, Senior Policy Analyst, and former Executive Director, Evan B. Donaldson Adoption Institute

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: Joanne W. Small, M.S.W is an adopted adult, adoption rights activist, author, and psychotherapist. She was executive director of Adoptees in Search (AIS) and served as the first and only adopted person on the Model Adoption Legislative Procedures and Advisory Panel. Her 30 year professional experience includes a post-adoption clinical practice, clinical supervision, in-service training and seminars, lectures, publications, and interviews with over a thousand adoptive family members. Visit her website at http://www.jwsmall.com/.###


The Adoption Mystique: A Hard-hitting Exposé of the Powerful Negative Social Stigma that Permeates Child Adoption in the United States, Hardcover, $28.95, is available via Amazon.com, Barnes & Noble, and Ingram. To request a review copy please contact Reina Santana at
rsantana@resmarketingalliance.com

Tuesday, September 18, 2007

AB 81, which expands the age that newborns can be "legally abandoned in California fro 72 hours to 10 days,, passed the General Assembly a few days ago. Bastard Nation opposes AB 81. Below is our letter requesting that Gov. Schwarzenegger veto.


September 17, 2007

Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger
State Capitol Building
Sacramento, CA 95814
Attention: Constituent Affairs

Fax:

RE: AB 81: Extension to Safely Surrendered Baby Act—Please Veto!

Dear Governor Schwarzenegger:

Bastard Nation: The Adoptee Rights Organization asks you to veto AB 81 sponsored by Assb. Alberto Toricco, which expands California's Safely Surrendered Baby Act, (safe haven law) to let parents “legally” abandon infants up to 10 days old. AB 81 is bad child welfare and family policy and endangers the integrity of every California family.

Because infants surrendered under SSBA are expected to be placed for adoption, Bastard Nation's objections to AB 81 focus on how the amended SSBA will affect the civil rights of adoptees, potential adoptees, their birth parents and ultimately the future of ethical adoption in California.

*AB 81 increases the pool of anonymous children available for adoption through unethical and unprofessional practices. It erodes the civil right of adoptees to their identity and heritage. The SSBA establishes parallel child welfare systems, where one system opposes the long-standing principles of the other: informed consent and a full record of identifying information and social and medical histories. SSBA eliminates adoptees' rights to identity by denying their access to original birth and heritage records.

*AB 81 promotes “legal” abandonment as just another consumer choice for parents. It opens the door to universal “legal” abandonment of children of any age. SSBA advocate, the late Dr. William Pierce, wrote on the Internet newsgroup alt.adoption that he hoped legalized newborn abandonment via safe haven laws would be the first step in legalizing anonymous abandonment of older children because adoption surrender procedures were "too difficult" for some parents .


*AB 81 increases the pool of parents--particularly non-surrendering parents--denied their right to due process by eliminating their ability to locate the dependency proceeding to which they are a party. SSBA replaces professional best practice standards with unprofessional and unethical "non-bureaucratic placement" by letting parents abandon solely for convenience or out of ignorance. It permits one parent to “relinquish” a child without the knowledge or consent of the other--usually the father. The law encourages parents literally to default at their hearings. Supporters call that "proper" and "courageous." We call it unethical and irresponsible

*AB 81 expands the number of disenfranchised natural parents, encourages unethical behavior, and hides crime. Safely Surrendered and Abandoned Infants in Los Angeles County—, a study published by the Inter-Agency Council on Child Abandonment and Neglect (ICAN), portrays LA County SSBA-protected parents for whom data is known as mostly poor, overwhelmed, frightened, and ignorant of child welfare practice. A good number of parents in the ICAN report as well as those who appear in newspaper stories throughout the state appear to be undocumented workers, leery of seeking professional assistance. In some states, safe haven laws haven been used to hide statutory rape and drug abuse.

*AB 81 reframes SSBA as a tool to “save newborns” from potentially “murderous parents” to one that permits “overwhelmed parents” to run away from their responsibilities via the drive-by dump. News accounts of SSBA surrenders include stories of clean, immaculately dressed newborns with stuffed animals, baby bottles and blankets, and notes to doctors, left at ERs. In several cases the parent has communicated to the safe haven recipient that they were surrendering the child anonymously out of love or because they lacked resources. Those parents did not feel homicidal, but simply wanted a quick or secret adoption. A few days ago an unnamed couple in Erwin, Tennessee, attempted to safe haven their 6-day old son because “he cries too much.” (WHJL-TV, Johnson City, TN, September 15, 2007). Does anyone actually think this is acceptable parental behavior? If a similar incident happened in California under AB 81 the parents would be praised and called courageous.

*AB 81 expands the pool of troubled parents who are denied access to family assistance. Temporary and permanent surrender options have existed for decades and are used by thousands of new parents every year. We have welfare and other programs through children's services that new parents can use when they lack funds or support. But with SSBA’s “no blame, no shame, no name” policy, parents are kept ignorant of these services and instead are encouraged to make uninformed brutal life-changing decisions for their children and themselves.

*AB 81 will do nothing to halt the deaths of newborns through neglect or murder. Since it’s enactment in 2000, SSBA has not decreased the deaths of newborns. A 2005 survey of county coroners found that the number of newborns dying from abandonment and neglect since 2001 remained at 13-15 per year.

Last year Assb. Toricco presented a similar bill, AB 1873, which you vetoed. That bill originally extended the age limited that babies could be “legally” abandoned from 72 hours to 1 year! This proposal was rejected by child welfare advocates, law enforcement officials, adoption reformers, and hardcore SSBA supporters including LA County Supervisor Don Knabe. Assb. Toricco then amended the bill down to 30 days, which was also rejected by them. AB 81 is a last-ditch attempt to let irresponsible parents test-drive their babies. If AB 81 becomes law, how long will it take for Assb. Toricco’s original 1-year timeframe to be enacted? Is the eventual goal to let parents anonymously dump a child who is inconvient or troublesome?

Last year you vetoed AB 1873. At that time you wrote:

The current 72-hour period contained in California statutes allows for a “no questions asked” safe surrender of a newborn and is supported by research and statistics that indicate that most neonaticide occurs within the first day. Some experts have raised concerns about this bill, which I share, that instead of improving child safety, increasing the time that a baby may be surrendered from 72-hours to 30-days, will have the opposite effect, putting newborns in greater risk by keeping them in an unsafe environment without proper care and supervision.

 AB 81 is open season on California’s families.  Please continue to hold the line.  Please veto AB 81.
 Yours truly,
 Marley Greiner
Executive Chair
Bastard Nation: the Adoptee Rights Organization

Bastard Nation is the largest adoptee civil rights organization in North America. We are dedicated to the recognition of the full human and civil rights of adult adoptees. We advocate the opening to adoptees, upon request at age of majority all government documents which pertain to the adoptee's historical. Genetic, and legal identity, including the unaltered birth original birth certificate and adoption decree.


Wednesday, September 05, 2007

BASTARD NATION TO DEVAL PATRICK: VETO SB63!


NOTE: Scroll down for Bastard Nation Action Alert and how you can help stop tihs bill from becoming law.

September 5, 2007


His Excellency Deval Patrick
Massachusetts Statehouse
Room 360
Boston, MA 02133

RE: Senate Bill 63: An Act Further Regulating Access to Birth Certificates—Please Veto

Dear Governor Patrick:

Bastard Nation: The Adoptee Rights Organization, the largest adoptee civil rights organization in North America, urges you to veto SB63. This bill establishes an unacceptable tiered system for adoptees to obtain their original birth certificates which are currently sealed by the state. Instead of treating all adopted adults equally, this bill doles out favors based solely on date of birth.

(1) Adopted persons 18 years of age or older born in the commonwealth on or before July 17, 1974 or on or after January 1, 2008 or an adoptive parent of an adopted person under 18 years of age and born in the commonwealth on or after January 1, 2008 will be "allowed" unrestricted access to the original birth certificate.

(2) Adopted persons born in Massachusetts between those dates cannot access their original birth certificates without a court order or other special procedures.

(3) The bill also establishes a "subject to appropriations" voluntary state-operated "contact information registry"--an apparent scrap thrown to the blacklisted, who will be forced to enroll in a government program with the hope that an original birth certificate might be forthcoming if a birthparent consents to its release.

Bastard Nation: The Adoptee Rights Organization opposes legislation that denies any adult adoptees access to their own original birth records on par with all other citizens.

*SB 63 grossly discriminates against adoptees. The bill creates an arbitrary state-constructed blacklist, based solely on date of birth, prohibiting certain adopted persons from accessing their own original birth certificates. Those born before or after specified dates are permitted unrestricted access. Those born between those dates are blacklisted and required to seek a court order to receive their birth certificates.

*SB 63 revives and legitimizes debunked spurious claims of “implied promises of confidentiality” to birthparents. Such promises are an urban myth and have been disproved repeatedly by activists, legal scholars, historians, and by court rulings. In 30 years of birth record access legislation, no document has been presented to support “promises of confidentiality,” “privacy” or “anonymity”-- implied or otherwise.

*SB 63 turns back the clock. In the last eight years Oregon, Alabama, New Hampshire, and Maine have restored to adopted persons, the right to access their own original birth certificates. Kansas and Alaska have never sealed birth certificates. Other states are moving toward full restoration of identity rights for all adoptees.

*SB 63 stigmatizes the blacklisted. It forces them to seek a court order for what is rightly theirs: their own original birth certificates.

Adult adoptee access to their original birth certificates is a basic human and civil right, not a privilege. Massachusetts holds no state interest in denying any adult adoptee their original birth certificate, or in creating a "special rights" status for selected adoptees.

Please veto SB63 so that in the next session adopted adults and legislators can work together to fashion a bill that will treat all adoptees equally. Selective "rights" are not acceptable.

Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,

Executive Committee, Bastard Nation: the Adoptee Rights Organization

Anita Walker Field

Patricia Marler

Natalie Proctor Servant

Marley Elizabeth Greiner, Executive Chair

ATT: Statistical Fact Sheet: Original Birth Certificate Access Statistics from Open States

Bastard Nation is the largest adoptee civil rights organization in North America. We are dedicated to the recognition of the full human and civil rights of adult adoptees. We advocate the opening to adoptees, upon request at age of majority all government documents which pertain to the adoptee's historical genetic and legal identity, including the unaltered birth original birth certificate and adoption decree.

Labels: ,


BASTARD NATION ACTION ALERT!

MASSACHUSETTS SB63
Please forward freely!

MASSACHUSETTS TRASHES ADOPTEE RIGHTS!

ADOPTEES BLACKLISTED BY DATE OF BIRTH!

Call, email, or fax Governor Deval Patrick IMMEDIATELY and urge him to
VETO SB63.

(Contact information below)


In 2005 we were told by members of the Massachusetts legislature "trust us." Unrestricted adoptee access to their own original birth certificates in Massachusetts is a "no brainer." In 2006 we were told "Oops! Our bad!" We can only "give access to some of you." The once clean bill, with the support of certain "adoption reformers" was amended repeatedly and quietly, until the right of ALL Massachusetts adoptees to receive their birth record was reduced to a favor for SOME. Although it passed both houses, the bill was pocket vetoed by then Governor Mitt Romney.

IT'S BACK!
Like a bad penny, the bill came back, resurrected as SB63, obnoxiously titled An Act Further Regulating Access to Birth Certificates. On August 30, 2007 SB63 passed the legislature. It will soon arrive on Gov Deval Patrick's desk. SB63 tosses a substantial number of Massachusetts adoptees, based solely on their date of birth, into a black hole without the same right of identity as everyone else born in Massachusetts.



(1) Adopted persons 18 years of age or older born in the commonwealth on or before July 17, 1974 or on or after January 1, 2008 or an adoptive parent of an adopted person under 18 years of age and born in the commonwealth on or after January 1, 2008 will be "allowed" unrestricted access to the original birth certificate.

(2) Adopted persons born in Massachusetts between those dates cannot access their original birth certificates without a court order or other special procedures.

(3) The bill also establishes a "subject to appropriations" voluntary state-operated "contact information registry"--an apparent scrap thrown to the blacklisted, who will be forced to enroll in a government program with the hope that an original birth certificate might be forthcoming if a birthparent consents to its release.

READ THE FULL TEXT:
http://www.mass.gov/legis/bills/senate/185/st00/st00063.htm

WHY SB63 IS BAD

SB63 grossly discriminates against adoptees. The bill creates an arbitrary state-constructed blacklist, based solely on date of birth, prohibiting certain adopted persons from accessing their own original birth certificates. Those born before or after specified dates are permitted unrestricted access. Those born between those dates are blacklisted and required to seek a court order to receive their birth certificates.

SB 63 revives and legitimizes debunked spurious claims of "implied promises of confidentiality" to birthparents. Such promises are an urban myth. In 30 years of birth record access legislation, no document has been presented to support "promises of confidentiality," "privacy" or "anonymity"-- implied or otherwise.

SB 63 turns back the clock. In the last eight years Oregon, Alabama, New Hampshire, and Maine have restored to adopted persons, the right to access their own original birth certificates. Kansas and Alaska have never sealed birth certificates. Other states are moving toward full restoration of identity rights for all adoptees.


SB 63 goes against the tide of rights restoration . It stigmatizes all the blacklisted adopted men and women forcing them to seek a court order for what is rightly theirs: their own original birth certificates.


Bastard Nation: The Adoptee Rights Organization opposes legislation that denies any adult adoptee access to his or her own original birth records on par with all other citizens.


STATISTICS

For an up-to-date stats on open records states go to BN's MySpace page: www.myspace.com/bnadopteerights


CONTACT


Please call or write Governor Patrick today to urge him to do the right thing: VETO SB63
.

His Excellency Deval Patrick
Massachusetts State House
Room 360
Boston, MA 02133
Phone: (in state)
Fax:
TTY:

Email template: http://www.mass.gov/?pageID=gov3utilities&sid=Agov3&U=Agov3_contact_us

Labels:

ARE YOU BLESSED OR ARE YOU BLACKLISTED?

q
MASSACHUSETTS SB 63
“An Act to Further Regulate the Access of Birth Certificates”

SB 63 is one of the worst bills ever devised in adoption history. Under SB 63, adopted adults will be separated into two distinct categories based solely on dates of birth. I call them the BLESSED LIST and the BLACK LIST.

MASSACHUSETTS’ BLESSED LIST.

1. Adopted men and women who were born before July 17, 1974
.
2. Adopted children who will be born after January 1, 2008.

If you are the Blessed list, you will be able to request and receive from the Commonwealth’s Registrar your original birth certificates without any restrictions.


MASSACHUSETTS BLACK LIST

1. Adopted men and women who were born between the dates ofJuly 17, 1974 and January 1, 2008.

2. Adopted adults in all of the United States and Canada. This bill has the potential to set an unacceptable precedent in adoption law. If one state, Massachusetts, is allowed to blatantly discriminate against 34 years of adoptees, the potential for other states to copycat is great.If you are on the Black List, you will only be able to request your original birth certificate by petitioning the courts.


HOW CAN YOU PROTEST TODAY?

SB 63 has passed both the Senate and the House and is awaiting the governor's signature within the next few days. Please phone, fax or email Governor Deval Patrick IMMEDIATELY and tell him to veto SB 63.

The Honorable Governor of Massachusetts Deval Patrick
Phone: 617 - 725 -4005
Fax (in state only) 617-927-9725
Email: http:www.mass.gov/


HOW CAN YOU PROTEST IN NOVEMBER?

ALL ACTIONS HAVE CONSEQUENCES!

THE SPONSORS OF SB 63 MUST ACCEPT RESPONSIBILITY FOR THEIR ACTIONS. THEY MUST BE VOTED OUT OF OFFICE.

SENATOR FREDERIC E. BERRY, Republican. Represents the districts of Second Essex, which includes Beverly, Peabody, Salem, Danvers, and Topsfield

SENATOR KAREN E. SPILKA. Democrat, Majority Leader of Senate, 2003 – 2008. Represents the districts of Second Middlesex and Norfolk

REPRESENTATIVE JOHN. A. LEPPER. Democrat, Minority Whip 2003 – present. Represents the Attleboro District, precincts one, two, and three
.
Save this list and watch for these names at the next election!

PLEASE FORWARD FREELY
posted by Anita at 11:05 AM 0 comments